Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv00276
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ERIC WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05791
Petitioner:
WAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH EL BEY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv03647
Plaintiff:
WAYNE SMITH EL BEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MICHAEL A. PETROLLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. PA State Attorney General
as 3:2013cv00897
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Wagner et al
as 4:2012cv02473
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Smith
Defendant:
T. Wagner, S. Snider, Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Patrick Amato v. Wayne Smith, et al
as 09-2708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK AMATO
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE SMITH, Police Officer for Paterson City, in his official and indivudual capacities, RICHARD KLEMENTOVICH, Police Officer for the Clifton City, in his official and individual capacity, AUDREY COOLEY, Police Officer for Paterson City, in her official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
DEANGELIS, Paterson Police Officer, M. MCDONALD, Paterson Police Officer and J. NAVARO, Paterson Police Officer
SMITH v. CARVER et al
as 2:2007cv00575
Plaintiff:
WAYNE SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
TIM CARVER, DALE MEISEL, KELLY ERICH and others
Cross Claimant:
TIM CARVER, DALE MEISEL, TIM CARVER and others
Cross Defendant:
KELLY ERICH, PRIME-CARE HEALTH SERVICES, KELLY ERICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
