Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Craig v. Wellington Regional Medical Center, LLC
as 9:2023cv81231
Plaintiff:
Heidi Craig
Defendant:
WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03828
Plaintiff:
LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as PALMDALE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as LANCASTER HOSPITAL, HRI HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as HRI HOSPITAL also known as HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. doing business as SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM also known as ANCHOR HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Montero v. Aargon Agency, Inc et al
as 9:2019cv81509
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Montero
Defendant:
Aargon Agency, Inc and Wellington Regional Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02173
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, LP, VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
JACKSON v. WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al
as 9:2018cv80541
Plaintiff:
TYISHA S. JACKSON
Defendant:
WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and PAUL L. TRUDELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
