Cases 1 - 10 of 9,264
Thrasher et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2025cv00926
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc., Elliott Company doing business as Elliott Turbomachinery Company formerly known as Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thrasher and Delores Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Champion Power Equipment, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation et al

as 3:2025cv00239
Plaintiff:
Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, LLC, Midwest Equipment Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Champion Power Equipment, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation et al

as 2:2025cv00844
Plaintiff:
Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC, MIDWEST EQUIPMENT SALES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Fairley v. CBS Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv00122
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brill R. Fairley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McIntyre v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2025cv00686
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., Eagle, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence McIntyre
Cross-Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Manville Personal Injury Trust, Bayer Cropscience LP and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
LeBlanc v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated, et al

as 2:2025cv00615
Plaintiff:
Hyson M. LeBlanc
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Eagle, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cross-Defendant:
Aerojet General Corporation, Eagle, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Montelongo v. Bayer CropScience, Inc et al
as 2:2025cv00555
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Montelongo
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Shell USA, Inc. and others
Cross-Defendant:
Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bourgeois et al v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2025cv00526
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Sparta Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and others
Cross-Defendant:
Eagle, Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
Errol J. Bourgeois, Sr. and Mary Anne Bourgeois Richardson
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Monroe et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al

as 3:2025cv00218
Defendant:
American Biltrite, Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company, Bostik Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Philip A. Monroe and Frances R. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jason Dunlavey et al v. 3M Company et al

as 2:2025cv01169
Plaintiff:
Eric Dunlavey, Todd Dunlavey and Jason Dunlavey
Defendant:
3M Company, Allied Refrigeration Inc., Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.