Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Lapin et al v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2024cv01552
Defendant:
John G Connors, Nike, Inc., Maria Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lapin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ayers v. Parker et al
as 3:2024cv01269
Defendant:
Michelle A. Peluso, Maria Henry, Peter B. Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Leung et al v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2024cv01195
Defendant:
Alan B. Graf, Jr., Peter B. Henry, Monica Gil and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Leung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rogers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Wescott v. Pollock et al
as 3:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Wescott
Defendant:
Mr. Roger M. Pollock and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carroll Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beckwith v. Trisha et al
as 3:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Med Tech Trisha, RN Abby, Dep. M. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00779
Petitioner:
Roger James Sanders
Respondent:
Patrick Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Whitaker
as 3:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roger Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
