Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Morgan v. Morgan-Parker et al
as 2:2022cv05393
Plaintiff:
Charles Ross Morgan and Charles-Ross Morgan
Defendant:
Ashley Nacole Mayeaux Morgan-Parker, Brian Gerard Mayeaux, Ronnie Shawn Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Van Dyke et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00266
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
William Van Dyke and Karen Van Dyke
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aaron et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jim W. Aaron, Jr. , Jimmie D. Adams , Teena Adams and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aaron et al v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 2:2011cv02877
Plaintiff:
Jim W. Aaron, Jr. , Jimmie D. Adams , Teena Adams and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DYKES et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62049
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. DYKES and ROSIE EUAL DYKES
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COUNTY OF BERGEN et al
as 2:2008cv01933
Plaintiff:
STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERGEN, FRANK DEBARI, MICHAEL RAND and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dyke v. Lates et al
as 1:2007cv00460
Plaintiff:
William E Dyke
Defendant:
Denise Lates, Paul Moritz, Julie Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bank of Albuquerque vs William T. Dykes, et al
as 1:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
Bank of Albuquerque, N.A.
Defendant:
Sharon T. Dykes, Antonio P. Maldonado, Juanita H. Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
