Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carmichael v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2023cv03641
Plaintiff:
William Carmichael
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Carmichael v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00049
Defendant:
C.O. Priess, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia DRC and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmichael v. Western Regional Jail
as 3:2019cv00913
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMICHAEL v. KRAFT
as 5:2019cv00622
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
GENE KRAFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ovide v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv13571
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ovide, III
Defendant:
Emily Carmichael, Consumers County Mutual Insurance Company and William Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Carmichael et al
as 3:2017cv00109
Defendant:
William Carmichael and David Dart
Plaintiff:
Erin McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. 20th Judicial District Court et al
as 3:2015cv00627
Defendant:
20th Judicial District Court, William Carmichael and Felicia Ann Hendl
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Carmichael v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84403
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc
Plaintiff:
William Carmichael
William Carmichael v. Tyco International (u.s.) Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77532
Plaintiff:
William Carmichael
Defendant:
Tyco International (u.s.) Inc
CARMICHAEL v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77532
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
