Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Brown v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08181
Plaintiff:
William J Brown
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer Health & Benefits LLC v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv03844
Plaintiff:
Mercer Health & Benefits LLC
Defendant:
William J. Brown, James Horrell, Kenneth Boster, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04910
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Brown et al
as 2:2019cv14149
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
CHANGES IN LATITUDES, LLC and William J Brown
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Federal Trade Commission v. Premier Debt Acquisitions LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Premier Debt Acquisitions LLC , Prizm Debt Solutions LLC , Samuel Sole and Associates, LLC and others
Receiver:
William J. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pelly v. City of Crowley et al
as 6:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dallas Pelly, Jr
Defendant:
City of Crowley, Police Dept of Crowley, K P Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Biomet Inc.
as 4:2014cv02997
Defendant:
Biomet Inc.
Plaintiff:
William J Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2014cv03320
Plaintiff:
William J. Brown
Defendant:
David Kennedy and Stephen I. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. FEDERAL CHECK PROCESSING, INC. et al
as 1:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
FEDERAL CHECK PROCESSING, INC., FEDERAL RECOVERIES, LLC, FEDERAL PROCESSING, INC. and others
Receiver:
WILLIAM J. BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
