Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Whitsitt v. San Joaquin County Mental Health, et al.
as 23-2264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH and RASMUSSEN, San Joaquin County Superior Court Commissioner
William Whitsitt v. USDC-SAC
as 23-70096
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH and RASMUSSEN, San Joaquin County Superior Court Commissioner
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
(PS) Whitsitt v. Grubb et al
as 2:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Defendant:
Grubb, Sheriff's Dept., Daves Towing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
William Whitsitt v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70035
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WILLIAM J. WHITSITT and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, FRIAD and others
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, KELLY MORRIS and others
William Whitsitt v. Meeks, et al
as 21-16636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
MEEKS, CLC Administrator, CITY OF STOCKTON, CITY OF MANTECA and others
(PS) Whitsitt v. Newsom
as 2:2020cv00691
Respondent:
State of California and Gavin Newsom
Petitioner:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
William Whitsitt v. George Lytle, et al
as 09-17875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE LYTLE, Badge #761, CENTRAL TOWING & TRANSPORT, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
