Cases 11 - 20 of 53
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, KELLY MORRIS and others
William Whitsitt v. Meeks, et al
as 21-16636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
MEEKS, CLC Administrator, CITY OF STOCKTON, CITY OF MANTECA and others
(HC)Whitsitt v. People of California
as 2:2021cv00871
Respondent:
People of California
Petitioner:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PS) Whitsitt v. Meeks et al
as 2:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Plummer, San Joaquin County, City of Manteca and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. Anna et al
as 2:2020cv01484
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Defendant:
Lindsay, State of California EDD Unemployement Insurance, Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2020cv01178
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, Morgan T. Fawver, John Afansasiev and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. Newsom
as 2:2020cv00691
Respondent:
State of California and Gavin Newsom
Petitioner:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, McKinley, San Joaquin District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Lodi, California et al
as 2:2018cv01964
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, Pacific Tow, City of Lodi, California and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Tracy, California et al
as 2:2018cv01962
Defendant:
Sgt. Ventura, Gardener and City of Tracy, California
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.