Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00021
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Giuseppe Giudice v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1869
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE GIUDICE, a/k/a Joe Giudice
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
STEVEN ABRAMS, PAUL W. SCHMIDT, LORY D. ROSENBERG, Esq. and others
Brevil v. Jones
as 19-562
Undetermined:
Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Pelege Brevil, Kenneth T. Jones, Undersheriff Orange County Correctional Facility and others
M. G. U. et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv01458
Plaintiff:
M. G. U. , E. F. and A. P. F.
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN , THOMAS HOMAN , DANIEL A. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00304
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00103
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00102
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00104
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
