Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Pena v. US
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHRYN B. ZIEMBA, HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Derrick Tartt v. USA, et al
as 19-5308
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Claire Williams, Justice (retired), Donald Pochyly, A. Lauer, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick B. Tartt
Roger Archambault et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05660
Plaintiff:
Robert Weisz, William Tatum, Jimmy Choi and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
William Justice et al v. J.P. McMahon et al
as 2:2013cv05157
Defendant:
A Common Thread, Inc., Does, Tristan W. Drew and others
Plaintiff:
William Justice and Bryan Sudbery
Justice et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv09029
Plaintiff:
Kelly Justice and William Justice
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
William Justice et al v. J P McMahon et al
as 2:2012cv09731
Defendant:
A Common Thread Inc, Does, Tristan W Drew and others
Plaintiff:
William Justice and Bryan Sudbery
Justice v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv03331
Plaintiff:
James William Justice
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edward Jefferson v. Shane Wooten
as 11-7128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE WOOTEN, Officer, CRAIG WILKINS, Officer, PAUL ZIOLKOWSKI, Lieutenant and others
Jefferson v. Wooten et al
as 1:2010cv02927
Plaintiff:
Edward Jefferson
Defendant:
Shane Wooten, Craig Wilkins, Paul Ziolkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
