Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MOSLEY v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00876
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MOSLEY
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33493
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mosley v. United States of America et al
as 8:2018cv01004
Plaintiff:
William Mosley
Defendant:
United States of America, Derrick Harrison, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Howard v. Mosley
as 5:2017cv01673
Plaintiff:
Adam Howard
Defendant:
William Mosley, Parish Transport L L C and American Southern Home Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CX Reinsurance Company Limited v. Camden Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03161
Plaintiff:
CX Reinsurance Company Limited
Defendant:
Camden Management Services, LLC, Kathy R. Smith, John R. Graham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mosley v. Groupon Inc., et.al.
as 5:2015cv01205
Plaintiff:
William Mosley and Frances Mosley
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , American Duct Pros, Inc, ADP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
