Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,997
Yogi Metals Group v. Barr
as 21-20615
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yogi Metals Group, Incorporated and Vinod Moorjani
Defendant / Appellee: William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
King Grant-Davis v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2157
Plaintiff / Appellant: KING GRANT-DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General, MARK KEEL, Chief of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07581
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Clarence Johnson v. Queen Elizabeth, et al
as 21-2562
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE D. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: ELIZABETH ALEXANDRA MARY WINDSOR, II, Queen Elizabeth, UNITED NATIONS, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
David Schied v. United States, et al
as 21-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People, a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE, CRIME VICTIM, Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT/BENEFICIARY (BENEFICIARY/RELATOR)
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, Donald Trump, in his public capacity as former U.S. PRESIDENT for the UNITED STATES, Denise Paige Hood, in her private capacity and public capacity as "chief judge" for the USDCEDM and others
Michael Rankins v. USA, et al
as 21-2038
Defendant / Appellee: J. E. KRUEGER, Warden, Regional Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity, T. J. WATSON, Warden, Complex Warden; is being sued in individual and official capacity, H. HURWITZ, Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL RANKINS
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Almaklani v. Nielsen
as 21-1265
Plaintiff: Sanad Al-Salami, Kaseem Almaklani, Ahmed Shariff and others
Defendant: Lee Francis Cissna, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kristjen Nielsen and Jeffrey Sessions
Defendant / Appellee: Donald W. Neufeld, Unknown Named USCIS Employees, United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fadh Nagi Saeed, Taiba Salem Abdulla and Kadijah Saeed
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Concepcion v. Garland
as 21-658
Respondent: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Danilo Concepcion

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?