Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Moore v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laketha Moore
Defendant:
William Reubart, Jennifer Nash, Gabrielle Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Flynn v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dawnyell Flynn
Defendant:
NDOC, FMWCC, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plasnyer v. Dzuranda et al
as 3:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Bric Plasnyer
Defendant:
James Dzuranda, William Reubart, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandecar v. Reubart, et al.
as 23-3622
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY VANDECAR
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Watson v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Kedria D. Watson
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
