Cases 1 - 10 of 78
BOONE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56542
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PIERRE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58268
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MANLEY et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55657
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F MANLEY , WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CECILIO et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv55327
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SANCHEZ et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48542
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv53225
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BASORA et al v FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL
as 2:2011cv49535
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DIAZ et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL.
as 2:2011cv52507
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BETANCOURT et al V FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL.
as 2:2011cv49538
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E. BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BODDEN et al V FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY ET AL
as 2:2011cv49539
Plaintiff:
WILLIARD E BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
