Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. Brancatelli et al
as 1:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank R. Brancatelli, Linda Brancatelli, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as a nominee for Wilmington Finance, a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Marlon T Segovia v. Wilmington Finance A Division of AIG Federal Savings Bank et al
as 2:2015cv03150
Defendant:
CountryWide Home Loans Inc, Does, Vanessa Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon T Segovia
U.S. Bank National Association v. Goldaneh et al
as 1:2012cv09743
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Alfred Goldaneh, Flordeliza M. Goldaneh and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as Nominee for Wilmington Finance, a Division of AIG Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Kingery et al
as 1:2012cv09240
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
James Kingery, Beneficial Illinois Inc. d/b/a Beneficial Mortgage Co. of Illinois, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as a Nominee for Wilmington Finance, a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Patricia Reese v. US Bank National Association
as 12-1850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. REESE, f/k/a Patricia A. Mack, et al the Injured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, US RESIDENTIAL FINANCE TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATE SERIES 2006-BC1, WILMINGTON FINANCE, a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank and others
Cindy Revere v. Wilmington Finance, et al
as 09-2224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CINDY LYNN REVERE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILMINGTON FINANCE, a division of AIG, Federal Savings Bank, DEVON TITLE AGENCY, COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
