Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Caterpillar Inc. v. Wirtgen America, Inc.
as 24-1681
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 24-1679
Appellant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 24-1680
Appellant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC. and CATERPILLAR INC.
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 24-1618
Appellant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 24-1619
Appellant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC
as 21-1127
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH, JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH and others
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. US
as 20-2145
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES R. STEUART, in his official capacity as Chief Intellectual Property Rights and Restricted Merchandise Branch, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection., JUAN J. PORRAS, in his official capacity as Director of Machinery Center of Excellence and Expertise of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. v. Wirtgen America, Inc.
as 20-1998
Appellee:
JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC. and WIRTGEN GMBH
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS INC.
Intervenor:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC
as 20-1623
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH, JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH and others
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 20-1527
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH and WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Appellee:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
