Cases 21 - 30 of 44
FREDERICK v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 4:2020cv00204
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY FREDERICK
Defendant:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2020cv00140
Defendant:
EADY, N D MULLINS, JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES C BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULLINS v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 4:2020cv00115
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
DERRICK EUGENE CULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cullins v. Wakulla Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2019cv02017
Respondent:
Wakulla Correctional Institution and Coker
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Cullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CULLINS v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2019cv00380
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and COKER
Petitioner:
DERRICK EUGENE CULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cullins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al (Hillsborough)
as 8:2019cv01862
Respondent:
Wakulla Correctional Institution and Attorney General, State of Florida
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Cullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CULLINS v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 4:2019cv00342
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
DERRICK EUGENE CULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAILEY v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX
as 4:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
ADONIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullins v. Wakulla Correctional Institution
as 8:2019cv01613
Respondent:
Wakulla Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Cullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CULLINS v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 4:2019cv00303
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
DERRICK EUGENE CULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
