Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00183
Petitioner:
Jessica Michelle Brown
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Wal-Mart and Goodwill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Jeffrey Immett, et al
as 23-35084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY IMMETT, CEO General Electric Company, DOUG MCMILLON, CEO Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and JOHN WATSON, CEO Chevron Corporation
Brown v. State of Nevada, et al
as 2:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jessica Michelle Brown
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Wal-Mart and Goodwill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bunton v. City of Fresno Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Ray Bunton
Defendant:
City of Fresno Police Department, Roadway Inns & Security Company, Wal-Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Wal-Mart Superstore
as 3:2020cv00228
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Superstore
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer L. Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2018cv08324
Defendant:
Prescott, City of, Harvey Skoog, Jodi Rooney and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddards v. Wal-Mart et al
as 2:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Maricopa County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Babeu et al
as 2:2016cv03921
Plaintiff:
Katrina Williams
Defendant:
Paul Babeu , G Kindsvater , Pinal County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eason v. Wal-Mart Corporation
as 2:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Raymell Eason
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummy v. Wal-Mart Sotres Inc
as 2:2007cv00438
Plaintiff:
Shawn Francis Drummy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
