Cases 1 - 10 of 105
The City of Bessemer, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00162
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Bessemer, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Irondale, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Defendant:
Allergen PLC, Actavis Pharma, INC.,, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Irondale, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ismeta Kadribasic v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
as 21-14177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMETA KADRIBASIC
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART
Valerie Strode v. Wal-mart Stores, Inc.
as 21-13470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE STRODE
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., n.k.a. Walmart, Inc. n.k.a. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv00770
Defendant:
ALLERGAN FINANCE LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Niceville, Florida and CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
James McConico, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 21-11293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and GREEN DOT BANK
Maria Granela v. Wal-mart Stores East, L.P.
as 21-11090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA GRANELA
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Jacqueline Struck v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 21-11012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE STRUCK
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
James McConico, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 20-12671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and GREEN DOT BANK
Clyde Dandridge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 20-12257
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE DANDRIDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
