Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Santana v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
as 1:2018cv11476
Plaintiff:
Sandra Santana
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bushey v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
as 1:2017cv10106
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Bushey
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bushey v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
as 3:2017cv10106
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Bushey
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Araujo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 1:2016cv12506
Plaintiff:
Silvino Araujo
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Ramirez-Vega et al v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01361
Plaintiff:
Eliazar Ramirez-Vega , Silvia M. Torres-Acosta and Conjugal Partnership Ramirez-Torres
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Currier v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Charles Currier
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Grady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey I. Grady
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave
Negron-Marty et al v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02201
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Negron-Marty, Maribel Orengo-Echevarria and Negron-Orengo Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Martir-Suarez et al v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02174
Plaintiff:
Joelle Anille Martir-Suarez and Minor F.A.R.M.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Wokoske v. Wokoske et al
as 1:2008cv12149
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. Wokoske
Defendant:
Scott A. Wokoske, Scott A. Wokoske, Bluecross Blueshield of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
