Cases 21 - 30 of 1,713
Rutledge v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as WAW/2:22-CV-00777
Plaintiff:
Rutledge and Tiffany Rutledge
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Maguire v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as CAN/3:22-CV-03238
Plaintiff:
Maguire, Michelle Maguire and Derek Maguire
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Gaddis et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as MOW/4:22-CV-00367
Plaintiff:
Gaddis, Tammy Gaddis and T. G.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Foley et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as MOW/3:22-CV-05040
Plaintiff:
Foley, Samantha Foley and A. V.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Nickles et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as MOW/4:22-CV-00368
Plaintiff:
Nickles, Stephanie Nickles and A. N.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
City of Sarasota v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2022op45021
Plaintiff:
City of Sarasota
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Palmetto v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2022op45022
Plaintiff:
City of Palmetto
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walmart Inc. f/k/a Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eddy County v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2022op45015
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Allergan Finance LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eddy County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Clanton, Alabama et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2022op45016
Plaintiff:
The City of Clanton, Alabama, The City of Columbiana, Alabama, The City of Helena, Alabama and others
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dean Waltz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 22-80014
Respondent:
DEAN WALTZ, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Petitioner:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
