Cases 41 - 50 of 52
MONAGHAN v. WAL-MART
as 2:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. MONAGHAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCKWELL v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 2:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
CONNIE ROCKWELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUPONT v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 1:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
AMBER DUPONT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC , BRAD ROSEBERRY, HEATHER JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
ROY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
MARYANNE ROY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2008cv00404
Plaintiff:
JEANNIE C CARSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TICE et al v. TAIWAN SHIN YEH ENTERPRISE CO LTD et al
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE TICE and DANA TICE
Defendant:
MEREDITH CORPORATION/BETTER HOMES & GARDENS and WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JENKINS v. WAL MART STORES INC
as 1:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE JENKINS
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUSSELL v. WAL MART STORES INC
as 2:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
SHARON RUSSELL
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC and CLH AND SONS INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
CLH AND SON INC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WAL MART STORES INC
Counter_claimant:
CLH AND SON INC
Counter_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cross_claimant:
CLH AND SONS INC
Cross_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALEXANDER et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
ANN M ALEXANDER and ERIC F ALEXANDER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
VICAIRE v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 1:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
LYNN VICAIRE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
