Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Schuman et al v. Energizer Holding, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Schuman and Kyle Kelley
Defendant:
Energizer Holding, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Portable Power, Inc. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Portable Power, Inc.
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Don Copeland, Joseph Murray, Carol Smith and others
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.