Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv00770
Defendant:
ALLERGAN FINANCE LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Niceville, Florida and CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
GILCHRIST COUNTY, FLORIDA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 1:2019cv00109
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GILCHRIST COUNTY, FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DIXIE COUNTY FLORIDA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Dixie County, Florida and DIXIE COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
TAYLOR COUNTY FLORIDA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 4:2019cv00270
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR COUNTY, FLORIDA and TAYLOR COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LEVY COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
LEVY COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA LP, PURDUE PHARMA INC, THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC and JAY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
