Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Townes v. Walgreens Company
as 4:2018cv01635
Plaintiff:
Valerie Townes
Defendant:
Walgreens Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson County et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv01477
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Company, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Taney County, Washington County, Iron County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Walgreen Company et al
as 4:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Walgreen Company, Does John and Jane Does 1-25 and Walgreen Company doing business as Walgreens No 10059
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZAMPITELLA v. WALGREENS COMPANY et al
as 4:2016cv00781
Plaintiff:
Dennis Zampitella
Defendant:
Walgreens Company , Kathy Kalowski , Brian Shut and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cater et al v. Pulaski County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00596
Plaintiff:
Layton Cater and Kenneth Cook
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas , Pulaski County Sheriff's Office , Doc Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Burdge et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burdge , Jessaca Hope (Hanson) , Darrell Jones and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv01649
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Walker , Renae Holzem , Thomas McLaughlin and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Backes et al v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2014cv04255
Plaintiff:
Danielle Backes , Robert Davis and Jacob Day
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
