Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2022cv01718
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Walgreen Company and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hess, III v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2019cv02732
Defendant:
Walgreen Co and Walgreen Company
Plaintiff:
Mr. Albert Hess, III and Albert Hess, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of Vienna, West Virginia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00052
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Vienna, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. City of Fayetteville, et al.
as 5:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Willie Thompson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville , Ramon Herrera , Andrew Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neil Caesar v. Walgreens Pharmacy #1252
as 15-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEIL CAESAR
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY KYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREENS PHARMACY #1252 and WALGREEN COMPANY, d/b/a Walgreens Pharmacy #1252
Dickey et al v. Walgreens Company Inc.
as 1:2014cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jamie Dickey, Regina Gray, Frank Maxwell and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
