Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett et al v. Walgreen Arizona Drug Company et al
as 2:2014cv02169
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bennett , John Herrera , Scott Kendall and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Arizona Drug Company and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Stone v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2011cv00948
Plaintiff:
Britteny N Stone
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benfante et al v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ralph R Benfante and Diane Benfante
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Zicam LLC, Botanical Laboratories Incorporated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv08258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stone et al v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated
as 2:2010cv02506
Plaintiff:
Jon I Stone and Gayle Stone
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Botanical Laboratories Incorporated , Zicam LLC and others
Chontos v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02271
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Chontos, Jr
Defendant:
Zicam LLC , Walgreen Company , Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaffer et al v. Zicam, LLC. et al
as 2:2010cv01614
Plaintiff:
Frederick Schaffer and Cindy Schaffer
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Walgreen Company and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists and Registered Nurses et al
as 4:2009cv00458
Defendant:
Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists and Registered Nurses and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
