Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Raymond Justo Kitilya v. California Superior Court West Covina
as 2:2023cv06171
Plaintiff:
Raymond Justo Kitilya
Defendant:
California Superior Court West Covina, West Covina Police Department and Wall mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Corrales v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81993
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Sanofi S.A., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Corrales Sandra and Sandra Corrales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
as 4:2020cv00417
Plaintiff:
Deborah Barriw and Deborah Barrow
Defendant:
Wall-Mart Stores East I, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Sams Club Humacao et al
as 3:2016cv02307
Plaintiff:
Lainey Ann Rivera
Defendant:
Sams Club Humacao, Wall-Mart of PR, Inc., A, B, C Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendrix v. Wall-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hendrix
Defendant:
Wall-Mart Stores, Inc., The Associates' Health and Welfare Plan and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arnold v. Wall Mart et.al.
as 1:2011cv01761
Plaintiff:
Eugene Arnold
Defendant:
Wall Mart et.al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strocchia v. Wall-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2008cv04286
Plaintiff:
Anna Strocchia
Defendant:
Wall-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
