Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Brice v. Dinwiddie
as 5:2008cv00642
Petitioner: Kenneth Jerome Brice
Respondent: Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brice v. Dinwiddie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00642
Petitioner: Kenneth Jerome Brice
Respondent: Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Dinwiddie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6124
Petitioner - Appellant: ALVIN PARKER
Respondent - Appellee: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden
Holden v. Dinwiddie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2008cv00211
Plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Holden
Defendant: Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fontinott v. Dinwiddie, et al
as 08-6090
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN FONTINOTT
Respondent - Appellee: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden and DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General
Mars v. Dinwiddie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6062
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES RUSSELL MARS
Respondent - Appellee: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden
Moore v. Dinwiddie et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00145
Petitioner: Trent Moore
Respondent: Walter Dinwiddie and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ali v. Dinwiddie, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5033
Plaintiff - Appellant: MURTAZA ALI
Defendant - Appellee: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden at DCCC, STEVEN BECK, Warden at MACC, ANITA TRAMMELL, Deputy Warden at MACC and others
Ciempa v. Dinwiddie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00119
Petitioner: David A Ciempa
Respondent: Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
In re: Rodney Cheadle
as 08-6050
Petitioner: RODNEY EUGENE CHEADLE
Respondent: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?