Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Rosalez v. Cromwell
as 2:2025cv00367
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Rosalez
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lietz v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2024cv01594
Defendant:
John Does, Warden Daniel Cromwell, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus M Lietz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markus McCormick v. Daniel Everett
as 24-6887
Respondent:
WARDEN DANIEL EVERETT
Petitioner:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
Carpenter v. Carmack et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Defendant:
Lt Troy Wilson, Jeffery Carmack, Warden Daniel Akers and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2024cv05051
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Daniel Sullivan
Petitioner:
Harry David Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler, Warden Daniel Galbraith and Harford County Government
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeal
Defendant:
Nathan Tucker, Warden Daniel Monti and Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Akers
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balderas v. Valerius et al
as 2:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Eddie P Balderas
Defendant:
Denise H Valerius, Wendy W Delmer, Warden Daniel Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
