Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lance Owen, et al v. Attorney General/State of SD
as 25-1194
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen and Warden Reyes
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Uhrich v. Reyes et al
as 5:2025cv05002
Defendant:
Warden Reyes, Sgt Jacob Knodel, Captain Daniel Sudol and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Uhrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Uhrich v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv05090
Defendant:
Unknown C.O., Captain Sudol, Kellie Wasko and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Uhrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Lance Owen v. Warden Reyes, et al
as 24-3557
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Reyes
Strong v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv04166
Respondent:
Warden Reyes
Petitioner:
Thomas Richard Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willingham v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv04069
Petitioner:
Donald Willingham
Respondent:
Warden Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04042
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Warden Reyes and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Parks v. Reyes, et al
as 23-15171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Defendant / Appellee:
REYES, Unknown: named as Deputy Warden Reyes of Whetstone Unit Arizona, DAVID SHINN, Director, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General and others
Cardenas, Gianni v. Reyes
as 3:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Gianni Gaspare Anthony Cardenas
Respondent:
Warden Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rapp v. Cook County Jail Law Library et al
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Robert Rapp
Defendant:
Cook County Jail Law Library, Tom Dart and Warden Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
