Cases 141 - 150 of 234
Diggs v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2015cv02117
Petitioner:
Fred Diggs
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2015cv00123
Petitioner:
Christopher Wright
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Austin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv00636
Petitioner:
Raymond Dean Austin
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2014cv02522
Petitioner:
Blake A. Riley
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beck v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2014cv00786
Petitioner:
Raymond Beck
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Imani v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv00660
Plaintiff:
Sekou Muata Imani
Defendant:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, Aufdin Kampe, Hupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Imani v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution et al

as 2:2014cv01358
Plaintiff:
Sekou Muata Imani
Defendant:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, Aufdinkampe, Hupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Dingess v. Warden, Noble Correctional In
as 14-3767
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE LORENZO DINGESS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Griffin v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2014cv00857
Petitioner:
Calvin Griffin
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2014cv00813
Petitioner:
Irvin M. Brown
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.