Cases 151 - 160 of 223
Ulrich v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 3:2013cv00274
Petitioner:
Steven M. Ulrich
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2013cv00761
Petitioner:
Jason Lee
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2013cv00465
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Warden

as 2:2013cv00099
Petitioner:
Shawn Wiley
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2012cv00797
Petitioner:
Geoffrey A. Davis
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2012cv00512
Petitioner:
Curtis Wright
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timothy Garnett v. Warden, Noble Correctional In
as 12-3613
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY C. GARNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
English v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2011cv00675
Petitioner:
Reco English
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billiter, Jr. v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2011cv00832
Petitioner:
Fred Billiter, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garnett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2011cv00765
Petitioner:
Timothy C. Garnett
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.