Cases 151 - 160 of 231
Horsley v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Danny Horsley
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetherby v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2014cv00361
Petitioner:
Karl C. Wetherby
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2014cv00105
Petitioner:
John Bradley
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mason v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2014cv00075
Petitioner:
Troy A Mason
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quigley v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2014cv00068
Petitioner:
Sean Quigley
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dingess v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2013cv01240
Petitioner:
George L. Dingess
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quigley v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2013cv00965
Petitioner:
Sean Quigley
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ulrich v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 3:2013cv00274
Petitioner:
Steven M. Ulrich
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

as 2:2013cv00761
Petitioner:
Jason Lee
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

as 1:2013cv00465
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.