Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Warden Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brian Mahoney v. Warden Daniel Martin
as 21-7666
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN EDWARD MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DANIEL MARTIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Velasquez v. Martin, et al.
as 1:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Martin, Major/Chief Michael Nessinger, Sergeant A Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Martin
as 5:2021hc02150
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Martin
as 5:2021cv00479
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Interested Party:
United States of America
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grabowski v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Wing Chau, John Doe and Warden Daniel Martin
Petitioner:
PIOTR JAN GRABOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butler v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #3, Officer S Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Martin
as 1:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boudreau v. Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Crystal Caniglia, Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, Kristin Damaso and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Boudreau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
