Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Mills v. Bishop
as 1:2022cv02538
Petitioner:
Earl Mills
Respondent:
Warden Frank Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Davis v. Frank Bishop
as 22-6857
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Durrell Lemon v. Frank Bishop
as 22-6475
Petitioner / Appellant:
DURRELL LEMON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Resper v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02012
Plaintiff:
Wayne Resper
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Holly Hoover, RN William Beeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pevia v Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01656
Plaintiff:
Donald R Pevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections, Warden, Frank Bishop, C.O. II Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyer v. Iser et al
as 8:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Case Management Richard Roderick, B. Cornachia, Warden Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Boyer
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Andrew Dicks v. Frank Bishop
as 20-6022
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Bailey v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv03409
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee Bailey
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Frank Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Cochran v. Bishop et al
as 1:2019cv03391
Petitioner:
Jeremy Shane Cochran
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Frank Bishop, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Duckett, Jr. v. Warden Frank Bishop
as 19-7660
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES EUGENE DUCKETT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
