Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner: Taquashone Ray
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piatt v. May
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner: Kyle C. Piatt
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sands v. May
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner: Joseph A. Sands
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. May
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner: Larry D. Stewart
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnette v. May
as 4:2023cv02027
Petitioner: Lorenza Barnette
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff: David F. Welch
Defendant: Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party: State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obhof v. May
as 1:2023cv02000
Petitioner: Dannail Obhof
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera-Fontanez v. May We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01830
Petitioner: William Rivera-Fontanez
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Butler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff: Martin Robinson
Defendant: Ohio State Patrol Lonnie Butler, V. Brown Legal Services, OH Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODR&C) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. May
as 3:2023cv01374
Petitioner: Gerald G. Scott
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?