Cases 121 - 130 of 200
Richard Bethely v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30820
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD BETHELY
David Williams v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30817
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID LEE WILLIAMS
Luqman Shabazz v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30782
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUQMAN SHABAZZ
Antonio Jackson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30772
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO JACKSON
Larry Robertson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30776
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DEAN ROBERTSON
Russell Ware v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30762
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL G. WARE
Mario Stewart v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30747
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO D. STEWART
Mark Hall v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30741
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK HALL
Albert Grayer v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, et al
as 19-30739
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL E. CROOK, Doctor, Louisiana State Prison, Individually and in their Official Capacity, BILL LACOSTE, EMT, Louisiana State Prison, Individually and in their Official Capacity, EDWARD RUSS, Individually and in their Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT A. GRAYER
Lee Jenkins v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30729
Respondent / Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEE ROY JENKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
