Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Moffett v. Jaeger
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Darius Darnell Moffett
Respondent:
Prairie du Chien Correctional Institution and Warden Peter J Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATTS v. EADDIE
as 5:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WATTS
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
JR LESTER J SMITH and LESTER J SMITH, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADY, TAMAJI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Warden Peters, Warden Phyllis Morgan, Sgt Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick B Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEAL v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00005
Defendant:
CAPTAIN HUDSON, DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WILLIAMSON et al
as 5:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
ERIC MILLER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE and SGT PHILIP WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Sergeant Moore, Sergeant Dees, Warden Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Cooks et al
as 1:2019cv00944
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Mary Cooks, Warden Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
