Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Sileoni v. Warden Richardson et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Warden Richardson, Warden Ramirez, Warden Mckay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brickley v. Lamb et al
as 4:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
James Brickley
Defendant:
Warden Lamb, Warden Richardson, Sgt Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paralegal Lifang et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Lifang, Robbert Wheiler, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr and Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacIntosh et al v. Richardson
as 4:2020cv02610
Plaintiff:
Albert Brooks, Angel Ramos, Calvin Brewer and others
Defendant:
Warden Richardson and Director TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ussery v. Warden Richardson et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Plaintiff:
Roy Ussery
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Director for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lt. Fuentes et al
as 2:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Lt. Javier Muro, Tanya Lawson, Megan R. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Roberts, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schorsch v. Miller et al
as 2:2019cv00323
Defendant:
Gene Miller, Asst Warden Daniel Fernandez and Warden Richardson
Plaintiff:
James Schorsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Daniel v. Mellenberger et al
as 3:2019cv00775
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curry
Defendant:
Unit Manager Mellenberger and Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Officer Adejugbe et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Officer Adejugbe and Warden Richardson
Plaintiff:
Devon Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
