Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee: DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee: VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff: BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court: In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Reginald Conley v. Warden, Southern Ohio
as 19-3416
Petitioner / Appellant: REGINALD CONLEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee: MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other: In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff: BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant: WARREN K. HENNESS
In re: James Sudberry
as 17-3350
Movant: In re: JAMES SUDBERRY
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: James Cline
as 16-3829
Movant: In re: JAMES M. CLINE
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Jerone McDougald
as 16-3816
Movant: In re: JERONE MCDOUGALD
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: James Sudberry
as 15-4320
Movant: In re: JAMES SUDBERRY
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Edward Smith
as 15-4042
Movant: In re: EDWARD SMITH
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: James Sudberry
as 14-4272
Movant: In re: JAMES SUDBERRY
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: James Sudberry
as 14-4051
Movant: In re: JAMES SUDBERRY
Respondent: WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?