Cases 81 - 90 of 169
Gill v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2013cv00578
Petitioner:
Wesley Gill
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhines v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 3:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
Antwan Rhines
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Theodore Smith, III v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correct
as 13-3717
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE W SMITH, III
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Perry v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 5:2013cv01196
Petitioner:
Marquez Perry
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ian Doty v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correct
as 13-3534
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN DOTY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Dwayne Stoutamire v. Lt. Joseph, et al
as 13-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE STOUTAMIRE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. JOSEPH, LT. ADKINS, C/O BOWER and others
William Dixon v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctio
as 13-3314
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
William Dixon v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctio
as 13-3311
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
David Easley v. Gary Haywood, et al
as 13-3306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EASLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY HAYWOOD, CHRISTOPHER BRANNIGAN and WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Jeffers v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2013cv00229
Petitioner:
John Clayton Jeffers
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
