Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackie Robinson v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3147
Petitioner:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN STEPHEN REYNOLDS
Mitchell v. McMaster et al
as 9:2023cv06604
Petitioner:
Bennie Mitchell
Respondent:
Henry McMaster and Warden Stephen Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr. v. Stephen Smith
as 2:2023cv09999
Petitioner:
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr
Respondent:
Acting Warden Stephen Smith and Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Kirsch et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Defendant:
Wyoming Game and Fish Department Game Warden Kirsch, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Game Warden Hymus, Wyoming State Board of Outfitters and Guides Employee Beres and others
Plaintiff:
Melanie M Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dempsey v. Smith
as 3:2023cv02182
Petitioner:
Patrick Dugan Dempsey
Defendant:
Warden Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trogdon v. DeGuehery et al
as 5:2023ct03065
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Trogdon
Defendant:
Dr. Limdsey E. DeGuehery, Warden Stephen Waddell and Sheila Sauls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Ms. Gaul
as 22-6592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. GAUL, CAPTAIN, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
