Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Trogdon v. DeGuehery et al
as 5:2023ct03065
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Trogdon
Defendant:
Dr. Limdsey E. DeGuehery, Warden Stephen Waddell and Sheila Sauls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Ms. Gaul
as 22-6592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. GAUL, CAPTAIN, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Whitlock v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00639
Petitioner:
Jovan Whitlock
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GAUL

as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. GAUL, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stafford v. Hoekstra et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Petitioner:
Damon Demond Stafford
Respondent:
Casandra Hoekstra, Warden Stephen Jacobs and Stephen Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Spaulding

as 3:2021cv00726
Petitioner:
Michael Ross
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.