Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Micheal Alan Goldberg v. Taylor
as 2:2024cv02313
Petitioner:
Micheal Alan Goldberg
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Merriweather v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv01732
Petitioner:
William Merriweather
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kareem Milhouse v. Saroj Gulani et al
as 5:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Doctor Saroj Gulani, Steenberger, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARBELO-DEVALLE v. WARDEN TAYLOR CI et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ARBELO-DEVALLE
Defendant:
WARDEN TAYLOR CI and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv05301
Plaintiff:
LOGAN CLIFF WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN TAYLOR, CAPTAIN STALLINGS, CAPTAIN LEEHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. Warden Cross City CI et al
as 6:2020cv01655
Defendant:
F.D.L.E., Medical Staff D.O.C., D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penque v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2020cv00338
Plaintiff:
Angelo David Penque and Justin Dewayne Shepherd
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, ACO Himilaya, Warden Taylor and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution
as 6:2020cv00769
Petitioner:
Vinodh Raghubir
Respondent:
Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution
as 6:2020cv00654
Petitioner:
Vinodh Raghubir
Respondent:
Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
