Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Devon Cooper v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15708
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVON COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lofton v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donte Lofton
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, Warden William Gittere, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Gittere et al
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, William Revbart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iden v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
A.G. Aaron Ford, Nathan Holland, Dawn Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Charles Daniels, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, NDOC and B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Bowdimer, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Exxum et al
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Doctor Exxum, Doctor Michael Hanf, Nurse Melissa Kington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
