Cases 1 - 10 of 34
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Melissa Coury v. Foster Wheeler, LLC, et al
as 19-35693
Defendant:
MAR-DUSTRIAL SALES, INC., an Oregon corporation, CH MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC., an Oregon corporation, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MELISSA COURY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Coury
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, a New York corporation
Livernois v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv02277
Plaintiff:
William Livernois
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, York International Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Noyes et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Crane Co., BW/IP, INC., Gardner Denver Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Noyes, Beverly L. Noyes, Robert D Noyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Melissa Coury v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 17-35492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELISSA COURY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Coury
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; sued individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CH MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC., an Oregon corporation, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, a New York corporation and others
Perez et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02603
Plaintiff:
Armando Perez and Sylvia Perez
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Bath Iron Works Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Perez et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02507
Plaintiff:
Armando Perez and Sylvia Perez
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Carrier Corporation , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jose Ortiz et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06550
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz and Pauline Ortiz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
