Cases 1 - 10 of 1,128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HORSCH v. CANTYMAGLI et al
as 2:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY HORSCH
Defendant:
JOSEPH CANTYMAGLI and TIFFANY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
HOPE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC. and PETSMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
Warden M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERRERA v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv04973
Plaintiff:
WILMA HERRERA
Defendant:
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC, HEARTLAND REALTY, LLC, KEYSTONE COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
