Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Jones v. Hill
as 25-3478
Petitioner:
WAYNE ELIJAH JONES
Respondent:
JAMES HILL, Warden of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Jones v. Appellate Defender et al
as 3:2025cv01244
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Appellate Defender, Pauline Villanueva, Elysia Inez Wilschke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Villanueva et al
as 3:2025cv01243
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Pauline Villanueva, Elysia Inez Wilschke, Savannah Montanez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. M.C.R.P. Program et al

as 3:2025cv01082
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
M.C.R.P. Program, M. Alexander, R. Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Oceanside Police Department et al

as 3:2025cv01091
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Oceanside Police Department and Vista Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Oceanside Police Department et al

as 3:2025cv01089
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Oceanside Police Department and Vista Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
as 3:2025cv00960
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Warden of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. California Criminal Justice System et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Defendant:
CDCR Office of Grievance, Jensen, Salono and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Urbano et al

as 3:2024cv01596
Respondent:
Urbano, Inmates Office A-2 and CDCR Officers
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.