Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Campbell v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02950
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Wayne Campbell
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dayle Wayne Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00576
Petitioner:
Adam Wayne Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHRISTINE et al v. HUDSON
as 3:2021cv20616
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL CHRISTINE and WAYNE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ROY W HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
CHRISTINE et al v. HUDSON
as 1:2021cv20616
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL CHRISTINE and WAYNE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ROY W HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66263
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Adam Campbell
as 21-1493
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM WAYNE CAMPBELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Borrero v. Campbell et al
as 3:2021cv00293
Defendant:
Shelba D. Johnson Trucking, Inc. and Eddie Wayne Campbell
Plaintiff:
Maria Borrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEB Hana Bank USA, N.A. v. Campbell
as 1:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
KEB Hana Bank USA, N.A. f/k/a BNB Hana Bank, N.A., KEB Hana Bank USA, N.A and BNB Hana Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
John Wayne Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Borrero v. Campbell et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Shelba D. Johnson Trucking, Inc. and Eddie Wayne Campbell
Plaintiff:
Maria Borrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
